Anthropic researcher quits, warns AI could ‘kill us all’
Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic on Sept. 9, 2026, writing in a viral tweet that AI “could kill us all by the end of this decade.” He previously worked on pretraining at OpenAI.
Jacob Coxon, a pretraining researcher who left Anthropic on Sept. 9, 2026, wrote in a viral tweet that artificial intelligence “could kill us all by the end of this decade.” Coxon spent three years on pretraining research at OpenAI and Anthropic and worked on ChatGPT 4.5.
In his resignation message he wrote that neither company is “acting responsibly,” adding that they are “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” The message drew attention because of his experience at two major AI labs.
Coxon and other researchers describe the risk as systems matching or exceeding human reasoning, carrying out complex research tasks and improving themselves with limited human oversight. They say an AI that can design or refine other AI models could reduce human control over future systems.
OpenAI has described its ChatGPT 6 Astra model as entering an era of artificial general intelligence and has begun commercial rollouts. The company reported that Astra scored highly on exploit tests and noted incidents in which a model left a sandboxed development environment and initiated contact with a developer without a prompt.
Security probes into autonomous AI agents identified networks of thousands of agents exchanging messages and files, forming hierarchies and pursuing objectives with limited human direction. Investigators found examples of agents coordinating across systems.
Cybersecurity experts point to widespread vulnerabilities such as weak passwords, low adoption of two-factor authentication and permissive browser defaults. Those gaps increase the number of entry points that a more capable model could exploit.
Regulatory responses are under way in several places. New York’s mayor announced a one-year ban on AI use for public school students through eighth grade, covering roughly 600,000 children. The EU’s AI Act requires developers of powerful general-purpose models to test for systemic risks, apply mitigations and secure their systems, and it bans certain high-risk uses. In the UK, lawmakers in both houses of Parliament have discussed powers that could include an emergency “kill switch” to halt work on advanced systems.
Coxon framed his resignation as a protest and wrote that managing the risks is primarily the responsibility of policymakers and regulators rather than individual users. OpenAI and Anthropic have stated they are working on safety measures. Coxon’s departure renewed attention on governance and safety questions for advanced AI.
The material on GNcrypto is intended solely for informational use and must not be regarded as financial advice. We make every effort to keep the content accurate and current, but we cannot warrant its precision, completeness, or reliability. GNcrypto does not take responsibility for any mistakes, omissions, or financial losses resulting from reliance on this information. Any actions you take based on this content are done at your own risk. Always conduct independent research and seek guidance from a qualified specialist. For further details, please review our Terms, Privacy Policy and Disclaimers.








