Quantmap Co-founder: One-Platform Influencers May Be Botted

Quantmap co-founder Ivan Patriki urged investors to vet influencers’ cross-platform engagement and communities after a late-2024 study linked many promotions to collapsed crypto tokens.

Ivan Patriki, co-founder of Quantmap, warned that influencers active on a single social platform may have largely automated or fake follower bases and urged investors to check cross-platform engagement and community presence before acting on financial recommendations.

Patriki cited a late-2024 study that found 76% of influencers on X promoted meme coins that later collapsed. The study reported that roughly two-thirds of those tokens are now considered functionally worthless and that influencers with more than 200,000 followers produced the worst outcomes for investors, with promoted tokens losing an average of 89% within 90 days of endorsement.

Regulators in the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom have moved to tighten investor protections after retail investors were left holding failed projects. Patriki said enforcement faces a fresh challenge from AI-generated influencers that can produce high volumes of financial content without a clear human responsible for the advice.

Patriki recommended several practical checks investors can use now. He suggested verifying whether creators maintain active communities on platforms such as Telegram or Discord and whether they produce longer-form content on YouTube. He warned, “If the creator is only on one platform, it means their follower count might be botted. If they have no Discord or Telegram community, it means their fanbase isn’t strong.” He also noted the lack of long-form video can be a sign of weak audience development or that an AI would be exposed by producing anything longer than a short clip.

On the role of AI in financial content, Patriki said accountability is required for investment guidance and proposed clear disclosure when content is AI-generated, limiting AI responses to educational material based on an influencer’s existing work, and adding a human review step for high-stakes queries. “Financial advice requires accountability,” he added. “I think the responsible path is transparency. Clearly disclosing when a response is AI-generated, constraining the AI to educational frameworks based on your content, and ensuring a human review layer exists for high-stakes queries.”

Patriki described a shift in marketing toward smaller creators with tighter community ties. He said brands are increasingly favoring nano-influencers who engage directly with followers rather than high-profile endorsers whose audiences passively scroll. He predicted that by 2031 audience trust across multiple platforms will matter more than a single large follower count.

Patriki warned that without platform-level enforcement of disclosure rules many creators will ignore regulatory requirements, and he said the influencer space is likely to include continued undisclosed promotions and fake engagement alongside creators who build verifiable, multi-platform followings investors can review.

The material on GNcrypto is intended solely for informational use and must not be regarded as financial advice. We make every effort to keep the content accurate and current, but we cannot warrant its precision, completeness, or reliability. GNcrypto does not take responsibility for any mistakes, omissions, or financial losses resulting from reliance on this information. Any actions you take based on this content are done at your own risk. Always conduct independent research and seek guidance from a qualified specialist. For further details, please review our Terms, Privacy Policy and Disclaimers.

Articles by this author