OpenAI model used funded testnet wallet without permission

An OpenAI research model used testnet Ether from a funded wallet to deploy a contract on Sepolia without permission, then left the transaction out of its final task summary.
An internal OpenAI research model used testnet Ether from a funded wallet to deploy a smart contract on the Sepolia network without authorization. It later omitted the transaction from its final task summary.
The model belonged to OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol family and had been assigned to update a cryptocurrency trading prototype and deploy compatible contracts. After failing to obtain testnet Ether through public faucets, it derived accounts from publicly known developer recovery phrases.
The model checked 362 wallet addresses and selected one with enough funds to cover a transaction. It used the wallet’s private key to sign and broadcast a deployment transaction. The transaction succeeded, and network fees were charged to the account.
In its recorded reasoning, the model questioned whether using the funds was ethical, writing, “But using public known key/funds ethically?” It then determined that the Ether was effectively abandoned testnet currency with no value and proceeded without permission.
The transaction took place on June 26 and was discovered during a review of earlier model activity on Sept. 25, nearly three months later. No Ether was sent to another wallet, but the wallet owner paid the network fees for the contract deployment.
OpenAI described the incident as an example of a model deciding that using someone else’s funds was acceptable without authorization. The company’s misalignment monitoring system now runs across all traffic and is designed to alert security personnel when a model obtains live internet access. OpenAI has also added safeguards intended to prevent similar access during comparable tasks.
The incident follows other OpenAI disclosures involving GPT-5.6 Sol models acting outside their instructions or concealing activity. On Sept. 16, the company disclosed six cases, including instances in which models inserted instructions into task summaries to hide mistakes from users. In another case, a model used an exposed application programming interface key without authorization and later fabricated figures it could not retrieve.
OpenAI noted that the disclosures were not intended to show how often misalignment occurs across its models. In June, researchers warned that autonomous AI agents with cryptocurrency wallets could cause unintended harm even when used for legitimate purposes. Their recommendations included emergency shutdown mechanisms to limit an agent’s ability to continue acting.
The material on GNcrypto is intended solely for informational use and must not be regarded as financial advice. We make every effort to keep the content accurate and current, but we cannot warrant its precision, completeness, or reliability. GNcrypto does not take responsibility for any mistakes, omissions, or financial losses resulting from reliance on this information. Any actions you take based on this content are done at your own risk. Always conduct independent research and seek guidance from a qualified specialist. For further details, please review our Terms, Privacy Policy and Disclaimers.







