Write for Us – Editorial Guidelines
GNcrypto publishes evidence-based crypto content from industry professionals, technical practitioners, and researchers. We’re looking for articles that serve readers making decisions – not promotional material or hype-driven speculation.
What we publish: Exchange reviews with real testing data, regulatory analysis citing primary sources, technical explainers breaking down protocol architecture, security guides for self-custody, and news coverage of institutional adoption and infrastructure development.
What we reject: Price predictions, token promotions, sponsored content, AI-generated articles without expertise, and marketing copy disguised as editorial content.
Our standards: Editorial independence is mandatory. We don’t accept payment for coverage. Published content remains exclusive to GNcrypto. We maintain full editorial control and edit for accuracy, clarity, and structure.
If you have expertise and can write clearly about crypto markets, blockchain technology, regulation, or infrastructure – submit your pitch below.
SUBMISSION FORM
Email: [email protected]
Response time:
Editorial review and decision may take up to one week. Declined submissions generally receive no feedback due to high volume.
Ready to Submit?
Subject: Publish article
IInclude in your email:
- Short introduction (2-3 sentences): Who you are, your background, why you’re qualified
- Pitch or article: Topic, angle, why readers care (3-5 sentences), word count
- Disclosure: Financial interests, token holdings, employment relationships related to article content
Editorial Principles
Independence is non-negotiable. We don’t publish promotional content, sponsored posts, or articles benefiting specific projects. Every article must prioritize readers’ practical insights over promotional goals. Companies seeking coverage should provide information for independent review – not write articles themselves.
Quality standards: Evidence-based claims with sources or testing. Technical accuracy mandatory. Clear writing without jargon. Original research preferred.
Exclusivity: Published content stays exclusive to GNcrypto. We retain editorial control, may edit for clarity and accuracy, and may remove outdated content. Authors receive byline and bio.
Who Reads GNcrypto
Our audience: Crypto investors researching platforms, professionals tracking regulation and infrastructure, developers seeking technical insights, skeptical newcomers evaluating claims. Content targets professionals making informed decisions, not readers seeking hype.
Content We Accept
News & Analysis: Regulatory developments, institutional moves, protocol upgrades, security incidents.
Platform Reviews: Real testing with capital deployed, cost breakdowns, execution quality data, risk assessment.
Technical Explainers: Consensus mechanisms, scaling solutions, custody architecture, oracle design.
Regulation & Compliance: MiCA, SEC enforcement, stablecoin frameworks – cite primary sources (official docs, court filings).
Infrastructure & Adoption: Custody providers, payment rails, tokenization platforms, TradFi integration.
Security & Self-Custody: Wallet security, key management, phishing tactics, cold storage practices.
Content We Reject
Price predictions, “top 10 coins” lists, ICO/airdrop promotions, project promotion without critical analysis, sponsored content, AI-generated articles without human expertise.
Note: This does not preclude well-researched professional analysis with clear methodology, disclosed assumptions, and evidence-based reasoning. We differentiate speculative price predictions from technical or fundamental analysis aimed at informing readers.
Format Requirements
Length: 800–2,000 words
Tone: Professional, direct, factual – no hype language or crypto slang
Structure: Clear headline, preview paragraph, subheadings, conclusive takeaways
Sources: Link primary sources (official docs, regulatory filings, research papers)
Links: One external link max in author bio
What We Look For
Original work: You tested platforms with real capital, analyzed regulatory text, broke down technical architecture, or synthesized data into coherent analysis.
Proper attribution: Clear citations for external data and quotes. Plagiarism = permanent rejection.
Disclosed conflicts: If you work for mentioned companies or hold relevant tokens, disclose upfront.
Examples
We accept:
- “MiCA Compliance Costs for EU Exchanges” (regulatory analysis with official documentation)
- “Testing Polymarket vs Kalshi” (real trades, execution data, transaction evidence)
- “How Ethereum’s Blob Space Works” (technical breakdown with code examples)
We reject:
- “Why MiCA Will Kill Innovation” (opinion without sources)
- Platform “review” without actual testing
- “Top 10 Altcoins for 2026” (price predictions)
Review Process
We evaluate: topic relevance, writing quality, sourcing, originality (we check for AI content), technical accuracy.
Accepted submissions: We respond within 2–3 weeks, including any necessary revision guidance.
Declined: No detailed feedback due to volume. Common reasons: promotional angle, insufficient expertise, already covered, no original insight.
Key principles: Expertise matters more than credentials. Reader value comes first. We maintain editorial control.
Questions? [email protected]
Last updated: January 2026