Saylor calls for a ‘Bitcoin Reformation’

Michael Saylor published a 14-section essay Aug. 24 calling for a ‘Bitcoin Reformation’ that rejects founder worship and mandatory self-custody and seeks broader institutional integration.

Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy Inc. (Nasdaq: MSTR), published a 14-section essay on Aug. 24 proposing a “Bitcoin Reformation.” The essay rejects treating Bitcoin’s founder as an oracle and opposes mandatory self-custody, while urging integration with banks, corporations, securities markets and governments.

Saylor frames Satoshi Nakamoto as the founder of Bitcoin and describes the original white paper as a foundation rather than an immutable constitution. He writes that Bitcoin has evolved from peer-to-peer electronic cash into “digital capital,” and that it can support credit, equity and machine-level uses without changing its fixed supply or open participation.

On custody, the essay argues self-custody should remain an option but not a requirement for every holder. Saylor notes that holding private keys offers an exit option and a check on intermediaries, while institutional custody brings legal and counterparty risks along with fewer operational failures and reduced single-key exposure. He cites the U.S. approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded products in January 2024 as an example of investors gaining price exposure without holding private keys.

Saylor proposes clearer distinctions between custody and lending and calls for product assessments focused on disclosure, legal claims, collateral, fees, leverage and failure modes. He describes six bitcoin-linked securities his company issues that separate corporate risk, dividend rights and capital priority, and he encourages evaluating custodians by segregation, audits, insurance and withdrawal rights rather than rejecting all intermediaries.

The essay cites recent security incidents to show that strict ideological standards did not prevent losses. Saylor points to a hardware wallet vendor’s weak random-number generation that left some devices vulnerable, a 2020 breach that exposed customer records at another wallet firm, and criminal cases in which attackers targeted holders to seize keys. He also lists past exchange collapses at Mt. Gox, Bitfinex, FTX, Celsius and BlockFi and notes U.S. authorities recovered much of the bitcoin taken in the Bitfinex breach.

Saylor outlines eight layers of use built on Bitcoin’s base protocol: digital capital, equity, credit, debt, currency, money, derivatives and machine capital held by software and robots. He says sovereign currencies would continue to handle taxes, wages and contracts while bitcoin could act as scarce, non-sovereign capital.

On governance, the essay points to the collapse of the BIP-110 proposal as an example that adoption determines which changes succeed. Saylor writes that “conviction is not consensus,” meaning developers can propose changes but miners, nodes, exchanges, custodians and users decide which ideas gain traction.

To quantify the market opportunity, the essay cites figures for global capital markets, including estimates that global equity and fixed-income markets run in the tens to hundreds of trillions of dollars and that investible gold is near $15 trillion. The essay closes with a set of principles including protocol minimalism paired with economic expansion, inclusion as a security model, and portability that survives any custodian. Saylor defines sovereignty as the power to choose, verify and leave and ends with the line, “Bitcoin is for everyone.”

The material on GNcrypto is intended solely for informational use and must not be regarded as financial advice. We make every effort to keep the content accurate and current, but we cannot warrant its precision, completeness, or reliability. GNcrypto does not take responsibility for any mistakes, omissions, or financial losses resulting from reliance on this information. Any actions you take based on this content are done at your own risk. Always conduct independent research and seek guidance from a qualified specialist. For further details, please review our Terms, Privacy Policy and Disclaimers.

Articles by this author