Token tanks 20% after Lubin’s ‘holding rewards’ tease
Joseph Lubin said on X that long‑term LINEA holders could become eligible for future distributions – from Consensys and aligned ecosystem projects – and added that MetaMask and Linea are “preparing something.” The token trades ~20% lower post‑TGE.
Joseph Lubin, Consensys founder and a key backer of the Linea blockchain, hinted that holding LINEA may be rewarded later. In a post on X, he said that long‑term holders could be eligible for future distributions, including tokens from Consensys and other aligned projects, and noted that MetaMask and Linea are preparing something together.
If we notice, at some date in the future, that you’ve held n LINEA tokens for m days, that just might lead to another token landing in your account.Joseph Lubin
The remarks landed in the first 24 hours after Linea’s token generation event. According to CoinGecko at publication time, LINEA traded near $0.024, trading nearly 50% below launch peak after spiking to about $0.046 shortly after launch. The project says 85% of tokens are earmarked for the ecosystem, with 15% allocated to the Consensys treasury.
Community reaction quickly centered on what counts as “holding.”
Questions quickly emerged over what counts as holding.
Will it count as holding if I put LINEA into a lending platform as collateral or into LPs?@patron4eg.
Others warned that paying people to keep tokens idle can tilt behavior toward speculation:
Incentivizing holding can shift focus from utility to speculation. How does this align with long‑term network health?@ByteBrainBB.
There was also sharp criticism from long‑time users about the rollout cadence and costs:
You had one opportunity and you screwed it… top users spent thousands on fees.@xyz2195.
Key details remain undefined. Lubin didn’t specify whether qualifying balances must sit in a wallet, be staked, or can be deposited into DeFi protocols; whether eligibility hinges on snapshots or continuous balances; or which partner tokens could be distributed and on what timeline. The reference to MetaMask suggests wallet‑level integrations, but no formal program or dates were announced.
The discussion also resurfaced questions about utility. Some holders are calling for a clear staking or lending venue to give tokens a defined role, while others see holding rewards as a bridge to deeper participation if paired with on‑chain use cases. For now, the message is simple: holding may matter later, but the mechanics – and how they interact with DeFi usage – are still to be clarified.
Recommended